Guide

The 8 best AI visibility tools in 2026.

When customers ask ChatGPT for “the best plumber near me”, someone gets named — and the AEO/GEO tool market for measuring who has exploded. We compared eight trackers on the axis that actually matters: which models are covered, and how each vendor prices and packages them.

Selection criteria: live product · tracks at least ChatGPT · reports ranking or share-of-voice over time.

Disclosure: Reputably is our product, and it is ranked first. Reputably was reviewed directly on 11 August 2026. The seven other tools were evaluated from their official public documentation on 1 August 2026; we did not run hands-on product tests of those vendors.

How we reviewed the tools.

This is an editorial comparison, not a laboratory benchmark. We checked official product, pricing and API documentation on 1 August 2026 and ranked products for decision usefulness, with extra weight on local-business and agency fit. We use no numeric performance scores because we did not execute a controlled cross-vendor prompt test.

  • Review date: 1 August 2026
  • Directly reviewed: Reputably
  • Documentation-reviewed: all other ranked tools
  • Models considered: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI experiences, Copilot, Grok and other engines vendors list
  • Geographic assumption: local and multi-location queries where city, region or country affects the answer
  • Criteria: engine coverage, geography, prompt limits, cadence, citations, competitors, reports, API and agency workflow
  • Scoring approach: qualitative fit and trade-offs, with no manufactured test score
  • Pricing: current public basis only; contact-sales pricing is labelled as such

Three terms you will see in this guide.

AI visibility is how often and how prominently an AI assistant mentions, cites or recommends a brand for relevant questions.

Answer engine optimisation (AEO) is the work of making information clear, credible and retrievable for systems that return a direct answer.

Generative engine optimisation (GEO) focuses on earning inclusion, accurate representation and citations in generated answers. In practice, AEO and GEO overlap heavily.

At a glance

Coverage, evidence and workflow compared.

ToolAI model coverageLocal / geographic supportPrompt limitsUpdate frequencySource / citation trackingCompetitor analysisReports / exportsAPIAgency / client workspacesPricing basisBest fit
ReputablyChatGPT, Gemini, ClaudeLocation-aware buyer questionsPlan-based workspace limitsDailyCited domains/pages + disclosed retrieval trailYesDashboards + CSV exportsMCP access; no public REST APIAgency planFrom $99/moLocal businesses and agencies that also need action workflows
ProfoundUp to 9+ engines, plan-dependentRegions supported50 prompts Starter; 100 Growth; custom enterpriseDailyYesYesReports and CSVDocumented APIEnterprise workflow$99/mo Starter billed yearly; $399/mo Growth; custom enterpriseEnterprise brands and content teams
Otterly.AIChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI experiencesCountry-level monitoringPlan-based search-prompt limitsDaily visibility; weekly link trackingYesYesReportsNo public API foundProject-based; verify client controlsStarts at $29/moAccessible self-serve tracking
Peec AIChoose 3 models on StarterVerify available locations50 Starter; 150 ProDailySource analysisYesDashboard reportingVerify current accessProjects, unlimited users, agency accountsPrompt/model-based plansTeams wanting simple share-of-voice reporting
Rankscale17+ engines240+ countries and languagesCredit-basedHourly to monthlyYesYesExports and white-label reportsGrowth and EnterpriseTeams and white-label featuresCredit plans from $20Broad engine and geographic coverage
Semrush AI ToolkitChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI; more on enterpriseMarket/database dependent25 custom prompts on base AI planDaily custom tracking; weekly brand performanceYesYesReports and exportsNot stated for this toolkitPer-domain; enterprise optionsFrom $99/domain/mo billed annuallyExisting Semrush teams
AthenaHQ8+ major AI platformsVerify market coverageNot publicly itemisedVerify current cadenceCitation insightsYesPlatform reportingVerify current accessMulti-brand workflowPricing not publicly listedGEO teams wanting optimisation guidance
Scrunch AIMajor AI answer platformsGeography filtersPlan / quote basedVerify current cadenceDedicated citations viewYesClient reportingDocumented APIUnified client workspacesPlans / contact salesMid-market, enterprise and agency teams
The ranking

Eight tools, honestly ranked.

1.

Reputably

$99/mo · 3-day free trial, no card

Our product. Reputably runs your customers' questions against ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude — all three in every plan — and refreshes visibility, sentiment and position daily. Prompt results connect to competitor wins, cited pages, disclosed fan-out searches and AI crawler or referral traffic. Then the same subscription finds relevant community threads and keeps your review profile strong, so you can act on what the evidence shows.

  • ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude in every plan — no per-model pricing
  • Fan-out searches, cited sources and AI traffic in one evidence workflow
  • Monthly billing, self-serve, free trial without a card
  • Tracking plus the levers: lead finding and review automation included
  • Three models — no Perplexity, Copilot or AI Overviews tracking
  • No enterprise-scale content planning or ten-engine analytics
  • Built for local/SMB use cases, not global brand teams
Coverage
Three major assistants
Local fit
Strong
Evidence depth
Prompts, competitors, citations, retrieval and traffic
Workflow
AI tracking plus lead and review actions

Best for: local businesses and agencies that want to know their AI rank — and change it.

2.

Profound

From $99/mo billed yearly

Profound documents daily answer-engine tracking, citations, competitor analysis, regions and a wide enterprise engine set. Its Starter plan is limited to ChatGPT and 50 prompts; broader coverage and higher limits sit on Growth or enterprise plans. Full comparison here.

  • Deepest dataset and analytics in the category
  • Broad engine coverage at the enterprise level
  • Strong content and citation tooling
  • Entry tier has historically covered fewer models — check current packaging
  • Fuller model coverage has typically meant talking to sales
  • Broader coverage and enterprise controls raise the cost
Coverage
Broad, plan-dependent
Geography
Regions and API filters
Evidence depth
Strong citations and raw-response analysis
Workflow
Enterprise analytics and content operations

Best for: enterprise brands with a team ready to act on citation-level data.

3.

Otterly.AI

From $29/mo

Otterly.AI offers self-serve AI search monitoring across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google's AI experiences. It documents daily visibility monitoring and weekly link/citation tracking, with limits determined by the selected plan. Full comparison here.

  • One of the most accessible paid entries into AI search monitoring
  • Broad engine coverage for an entry-level tracker
  • Strong international/country-level tracking
  • Some models have been sold as add-ons — check what's included at each tier
  • Prompt caps meter everything
  • Tracking only — no lead or review workflow
Coverage
Broad self-serve engine set
Geography
Country-level monitoring
Evidence depth
Mentions, links and citations
Workflow
Accessible tracking and reporting

Best for: testing the waters of AI visibility on a small budget.

4.

Peec AI

Self-serve monthly · free trial

Peec AI publishes prompt-based self-serve plans with daily tracking, projects and unlimited users. Starter includes 50 prompts and a choice of three models; Pro raises the prompt allowance. Its agency option supports multi-brand workflows.

  • Solid model coverage on standard plans
  • Clean competitor share-of-voice reporting
  • Agency workflows built in
  • Some models have sat in higher tiers — check plan
  • Costs rise with prompt volume and model breadth
  • Tracking only
Coverage
Choose models by plan
Geography
Verify required markets
Evidence depth
Share of voice, competitors and sources
Workflow
Projects, unlimited users and agency accounts

Best for: European marketing teams wanting competitor benchmarking.

5.

Rankscale

Self-serve monthly · free trial

Rankscale is the breadth play: 17+ engines, 240+ countries and languages, multiple tracking frequencies and credit-based plans. Its public pricing starts at $20, while API access begins on higher tiers.

  • Unusually broad engine list for the price
  • Broad model coverage in standard plans — check the current list
  • Credit system scales with actual use
  • Credits run out fast with many prompts × engines
  • Younger product; lighter analytics
  • Tracking only
Coverage
Very broad engine list
Geography
240+ countries and languages
Evidence depth
Citations, competitors and exports
Workflow
Credits, teams, white-label and higher-tier API

Best for: engine-breadth on a budget.

6.

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

From $99/domain/mo billed annually

Semrush's AI plan combines broad brand-performance data with 25 custom prompts tracked daily. Its official feature documentation distinguishes weekly market-level performance from daily custom position tracking and lists broader engine coverage on enterprise tiers.

  • Integrates with the Semrush stack your team may already use
  • Familiar reporting and workflows
  • Backed by a large data operation
  • Base pricing is per domain and billed annually
  • Only 25 custom prompts on the base AI plan
  • Claude and Grok coverage sits in enterprise packaging
Coverage
Broad, with more engines on enterprise
Geography
Market and database dependent
Evidence depth
Citations, competitors and reports
Workflow
Fits established Semrush operations

Best for: teams already paying for Semrush.

7.

AthenaHQ

Pricing not publicly listed

AthenaHQ presents a GEO-focused platform with multi-platform visibility, competitive intelligence, citation analysis, hallucination detection and optimisation guidance. Its public site offers an audit, but does not publish enough plan detail to make a reliable price or prompt-limit comparison.

  • Broad model coverage in standard plans
  • Competitive and citation intelligence
  • Optimisation and hallucination workflows
  • Public pricing and prompt limits are not itemised
  • API availability needs vendor confirmation
  • No lead or review workflow
Coverage
8+ major platforms claimed
Geography
Verify required markets
Evidence depth
Citations, competitors and hallucinations
Workflow
GEO analysis and optimisation guidance

Best for: GEO-first teams wanting broad visibility and optimisation guidance.

8.

Scrunch AI

Plans / contact sales

Scrunch AI focuses on AI search visibility and how agents experience a site. Its official documentation describes citation tracking, geography filters, agency/client workspaces and a query API.

  • Agent-experience analysis is a differentiated angle
  • Solid model coverage in standard plans
  • Documented API and client workflows
  • Public pricing is not sufficiently detailed for a like-for-like quote
  • Young category positioning still settling
  • Tracking and site analysis only
Coverage
Major answer platforms
Geography
Filtering documented
Evidence depth
Dedicated citation and response data
Workflow
Agency/client workspaces and API

Best for: mid-market companies optimizing their site for AI agents.

How to choose

Count the models you'll actually be asked about.

The pricing tables hide one question that decides everything: which models can you afford to watch? Your customers use ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. Several tools on this list make one or two of those three an upsell — an add-on, an enterprise tier, a “contact sales”. Price the coverage you need, not the headline tier.

The second question: what happens after a bad score? Look for the evidence behind it: which pages were cited, what searches the engine disclosed, which sites were surfaced or passed over, and whether AI crawlers or referrals reached your site. Then ask whether the product helps you act on those findings. That's the gap Reputably is built to close: measurement, answer evidence and the reputation workflows that support improvement, from $99/month.

Sources and verification

Official product sources used.

All non-Reputably claims were documentation-reviewed on 1 August 2026. Pricing, model coverage and limits change quickly, so verify the exact plan before purchase.

FAQ

Choosing an AI visibility tool, answered.

What is an AI visibility tool?

An AI visibility tool (also called an AEO or GEO tool) measures whether AI assistants like ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude mention or recommend your business when people ask relevant questions. It runs your target prompts against the models on a schedule and reports your presence, position and competitors over time.

What is the cheapest way to track AI visibility?

Entry-level trackers like Rankscale and Otterly cost less than Reputably, but they track less and meter prompts. Reputably includes ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude tracking in its $99/month plan alongside lead finding and review automation — the cheapest route to all three major models plus the tools to act.

Which AI visibility tools track Claude and Gemini?

Fewer than you'd expect. On several trackers, Claude or Gemini have historically been sold as add-ons or reserved for higher tiers — check what's included at each tier before you buy. Reputably includes ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude in every plan.

Do I need an enterprise AEO platform?

If you're a large brand coordinating content across many engines, markets and teams, an enterprise platform may be the right fit. A local business or agency can use a more focused tool that still shows recommendations, competitors, citations, disclosed retrieval searches and AI traffic without paying for enterprise breadth.

Go deeper

Related reading.

Positioning reviewed 1 August 2026 from official public documentation. Pricing, packaging and model coverage change quickly in this category — confirm current details on each vendor's site. All product names are trademarks of their respective owners; Reputably is not affiliated with any tool listed except Reputably itself.